The registration and score reporting services on this website will be temporarily unavailable for system maintenance on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, between 7:30 AM – 4:30 PM ET / 6:30 AM – 3:30 PM CT / 5:30 AM – 2:30 PM MT / 4:30 AM – 1:30 PM PT / 3:30 AM – 12:30 PM AKT / 2:30 AM – 11:30 AM HAT. We apologize for any inconvenience. Online-proctored exams scheduled during this time will not be affected; however, there may be a brief period where appointments may not be started. If you cannot begin your appointment, please wait a short period and then try again.
About CalAPA
At its September 2013 meeting, the Commission amended the requirements for earning a preliminary administrative services credential to include, when developed, passage of an administrator performance assessment. The CTC developed a model of administrator performance assessment, the California Administrator Performance Assessment (CalAPA), which is now complete and required of all candidates of the Preliminary Administrative Services Credential.
This development effort includes the following main steps:
CalAPA Design
The CalAPA has been purposefully structured to address the state's Administrator Performance Assessment Design and Program Implementation Standards as well as key elements of the California Administrator Performance Expectations (CAPE). The CAPE are aligned with the California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSEL). Adopted by the CTC in June 2016, the CAPE provide the conceptual and practical basis for the following three leadership cycles that comprise the CalAPA, with a focus on organizational development, change management, and leadership.
- Leadership Cycle 1: Analyzing Data to Inform School Improvement and Promote Equity
- Leadership Cycle 2: Facilitating Communities of Practice
- Leadership Cycle 3: Supporting Teacher Growth
Each leadership cycle includes four inquiry-oriented steps: (1) investigate, (2) plan, (3) act, and (4) reflect. The Commission's CalAPA model provides an overarching conceptual framework of progressively interrelated cognitive steps to help guide and refine the administrative candidate's thinking and encourage decision-making throughout each cycle.
Acceptable evidence may be in a variety of forms, including video recordings and written narrative.
Together, these leadership cycles and the related rubrics assess a range of the CAPE.
Need More Time?
To continue your session, select Stay Signed In.